Formerly About Applied Materials Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Applied Materials

AMAT 261.90

+0.4%

Dec 26 9:30 AM EST

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Fred Levine who wrote (65925)	9/16/2002 10:51:27 PM
From: Zeev Hed	Read Replies (2) of 70976

Fred, the difference between us and Israel is that Saddam used to daily state that he'll eradicate the state of Israel, so their bombing was self defense (and actually, not even an act of opening a war, Iraq never even signed an armistice with Israel, so when threatened, they are right to take preventive defensive actions). On the other hand, Iraq bombed Israel (not military targets like their bomb making facility, but civilian targets) with scuds during Desert Storm, so Israel still have the right of "retaliation" if nothing else on that unresponded act (g). Maybe, there is a legal way to transfer those retaliatory rights to the US? (vbg). Zeev

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next