SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Rascal who wrote (44733)9/17/2002 9:22:03 AM
From: LindyBill  Read Replies (3) of 281500
 
Cspan is the only place that gives the questioner and the answerer time to communicate.


I like C-SPAN. But ya gatta understand it's limitations. No hard questions. No "Cross." Ritter is contradicting what he said a couple of years ago, he is traveling back and forth the Iraq on Iraq money, and he has admitted to taking a bundle from them.

But, to me, that is beside the point. Saddam has to go because of the public behavior he has engaged in no matter what his present level of WMD. He has a 10 year history of lying about the weapons. There is no argument that he has Bio and Chem weapons and is trying to produce more.

Why are you grasping at straws like Ritter when you have a whole ocean of history of Saddam's criminal record? Why are you trying to defend Hussain's record? Do you want him to stay in power no matter what?

Or is it that you are so wrapped up in "Partisan Politics" that you will defend any position that you view as opposite to what the Administration wants to do?
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News