Foreign Affairs Discussion Group Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Rascal who wrote (44768)	9/17/2002 10:58:53 AM
From: Ilaine	Read Replies (1) of 281500

Becoming current on Ritter's position then and now is really mandatory for us to discuss this furthur. Why not? Ritter is important because Ritter can tell us something that very few people can tell us. He was actually in Iraq, actually inspecting Iraq's WMD facilities. It is a universal truth that people have good memories about something that just happened, but after several years, the memory is less clear. Ritter has not been a weapons inspector for the last four years. So he is talking about something that happened four years ago. His memory was probably better then than it is now. Isn't that the way things usually go? What changed his mind?

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next