SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: LindyBill who wrote (44977)9/18/2002 12:21:10 AM
From: Nadine Carroll  Read Replies (1) of 281500
 
I am reminded of an exchange I saw on Inside Washington. The subject was some measure that was against gun control and generally for the right to bear arms. Jack Beatty and Nina Totenburg, noted that Bush had not been under any political pressure to support this measure and did not derive any obvious immediate benefit from it, supposed that he was tossing 'some red meat' to the true believers. Charles Krauthammer replied, "My dear incorrigible colleagues, you simply cannot believe that Bush ever does anything because he believes in it."

There are a lot of people on the left who simply cannot believe that anyone, let alone W, could go to war because they believe it is the right thing to do for the country. So it has to be arrogance, machismo, revenge, politics, oil, group hysteria (see Alter's column in the Boston Globe today?), any other reason will do.

Now of course, this being the real world, considerations of national advantage, politics and oil are not absent from the picture entirely. But I don't believe that any of them are the prime movers of affairs.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext