who gives a shit? move on... not worth it
I read 2-3 out of 10 that ScottStockFace posts
surely, many have a liberal bias
it is their turn
from 1996-2000, the predominant editorials had a conservative bias
I didnt like that any more than liberal bias
but who gives a shit?
Tim, if you think that bias, ignoring facts, not reading history or learning from it, alienating allies, and promoting conflict despite blindly regarding risks is ALL FARFETCHED...
then I have a VietNam War to show you
our country's history is littered with amateurs embarking on adventures, setting up puppet govts abroad, only to watch in dismay as "blowback" occurs
e.g. Iran, VietNam, Afghanistan
I look at Scott's posts as 50% illuminating, 25% biased crapp, and 25% not worth reading a 37th time on well-covered material
I personally wish he had a more balanced set of posted messages, but so what?
I dont read half of your stuff either, which I largely consider biased on the other side. but with far more claims about being factual (which is always very humorous)
/ jim |
