Foreign Affairs Discussion Group Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Rascal who wrote (45881)	9/21/2002 1:55:56 PM
From: epsteinbd	Read Replies (1) of 281500

All those well said points are valid provided they answer the following : Is the top Washington Administration wrong by thinking that, if there remains a governing body in a country that harbors WMD (Irak), and could have reasons to associate, even indirectly, with extremists Muslims, then it's better to take that gov out and do your US best to try to "democratise" the country the way you US used to do (Irak rich enough to succeed, fortunately); the alternative being : giving the "bad guys" time to organise and to LEARN!, being obviously negative. That not meaning there won't be casualties. A Big One (earthquake, not bomb), in LA etc is possible too. Can you answer that one, if you were a top WashingTonn guy ?

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next