Canadian REITS, Trusts & Dividend Stocks Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Canadian REITS, Trusts & Dividend Stocks

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Lorne Larson who wrote (4294)	9/21/2002 6:52:08 PM
From: Peter W. Panchyshyn	Read Replies (1) of 11633

You are truly and genuinely nuts. A complete raving fool. Do you honestly believe I post every sale and purchase I make on this board? ---- What I believe and what your past postings show is that you lie about a good many of your "superior trades". Now someone who was truly a superior trader would not hesitate to show each of his trades. To use these to either help joe average or to show how really good he is. You talk alot of individual trusts. But you hardly give buys and sells. Only to come back later and say look how well you did. And you have never ever provided any sort of method to all here to show or let them test for themselves. I do all of that. And what you do is come out here and ignore the evidence of that. OTHERS DON'T. And when I show once again that evidence (real trust data) then you run away. To only come back later and start the same childish game all over again. Unlike yourself, you pathetic POS, I have a life beyond this board. Get some professional help. ------ Your only here to antagonize and tell everyone how superior you are. When asked for any evidence from anyone you just don't give any. Bill asked for evidence of stripping for GLH you did not give it. Russett asked "" if you can do well, let us all in on it"". You never replied anything to that request. Though in fairness it was opened to all the traders ----- UNLIKE YOU I GIVE HELP. -------- I will find your posts concerning your idiotic theory that one should always buy more of what you already own. Simply haven't had time to wade through your reams of useless garbage. For the record, I take it that you deny that you ever postulated such a theory? Yes or no? ------ You twist the theory as I said it in my earlier reply to suit your needs. I clearly state once again that for the trusts it is most always better not to switch to another trust because you switch for the wrong reasons at the wrong times. And encur unnecessary real lossess and or encur added costs for doing so, which eat away returns. And that is why accumulating at the cyclical lows ensures that you lower your cost base. When the cycle moves again higher (BECAUSE IT DOES ,ALWAYS HAS) it moves at least to and a good many times over your average cost base (gravy) because of the large accumulating. Its done it twice already for NCF in the past year and half and will again. (ITS DONE IT FOR OTHER TRUSTS AS WELL, MOST OTHERS)And the historical trust trading data shows that to be the long term case. As I have posted many long term trading past trust trading numbers. It also did it for that LUS example. Add to the above is that fact that with more and more units accumulated comes more and more high current income (meat). Now I provide 2 cases where it works. And works well ( NO REAL LOSSES "ONLY MEAT" AND FROM TIME TO TIME DEPENDING ON THE INDIVIDUAL TRUST "SOME GRAVY" AND NOT ONE BIT OF EXTRA EFFORT OR WORRIES ABOUT EVERY LITTLE THING EVERY MINUTE OF EVERY DAY ). Your turn to provide two case where it does not work. If you do that then I will return to give more cases where it works. Then you can counter them. The first to run out of supporting evidence will be the loser. ------------------ YOU HAVEN'T THE BRAINS OR THE BALLS TO TAKE UP THE CHALLENGE.-----------

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next