Foreign Affairs Discussion Group Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: JohnM who wrote (46005)	9/21/2002 10:52:34 PM
From: LindyBill	Read Replies (1) of 281500

The case the Bush folk make for preemptive attack on our part is that we are in immediate danger. No, they are not, John. They are setting up a case that Saddam has the ability to do these things, and the proven BG of doing them, and that we do not want to leave him in a position to do them at his choosing. You are the one who is setting up the "immediate danger" criteria. You know our government is not going to catch him in a totally "smoking gun" situation. By the time this happens, it will be too late. By using this criteria, you will never have to admit that we should move on Saddam. You want to leave us in a "Retaliation" mode. You want them to have to "hit first." We are not willing to settle for that.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next