SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Stockman Scott's Political Debate Porch
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Dan B. who wrote (7069)9/22/2002 11:40:11 AM
From: TigerPaw  Read Replies (2) of 89467
 
The conclusion of the article seems to be that Mr. Ritter's stance on Iraq DOES fly in the face of his own prior statements,

Your explanation contains an implicit assumption that nothing has changed in Iraq in the years during and since the Gulf War. Furthermore it assumes that the context of the rest of the world has not changed in that time either. Finally there is an assumption that the choice is between killing Saddam and ignoring him with no middle ground.

we've heard him say he stands behind ALL of his prior statements
There is no inconsistency here, his prior statements were about a prior situation at a prior time.
TP
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News