Canadian REITS, Trusts & Dividend Stocks Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Canadian REITS, Trusts & Dividend Stocks

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Lorne Larson who wrote (4323)	9/22/2002 5:18:28 PM
From: Peter W. Panchyshyn	Read Replies (1) of 11633

So now your argument is that you should ALWAYS buy more of the trust you hold because "it lowers your cost base". Simply because it lowers your cost base does not make it a better buy than any other trust. You continue to spout these inanities. (That the best you could come up with after a night of sweating it?) -------- Yet once again I show numbers you can try to dispute and you avoid them like the plague. WHATS THE MATTER.???????????????????? YOU CAN'T. Those numbers in that example I just gave show that the one who bought more like was said by my theory ended up with the better outcome. PURE AND SIMPLE. ----------- ------- Hardly sweating it. I just use simple math. And simple numbers. You avoid the math and you avoid the numbers. AS ALL CAN SEE HERE. YOU PROVIDE NONE YOURSELF AND YOU CANT COUNTER ANY OF MINE So while you make statements supported by nothing I use real math and real numbers to support my theories. YOUR PATHETIC AT DEBATE AND YOUR PATHETIC AT INVESTING> THE ONLY WAY YOU CAN SHOW SUPERIOR IS TO LIE ABOUT IT AND AFTER THE FACT IT> YOU WONT SHOW ANY METHOD THAT OTHERS CAN TEST YOUR WILD CLAIMS YOUR A COWARD AND A FRAUD. Others here have been nice asking you here for some info and insight into your method and you refuse them. I challenge you for the same and you refuse THAT SHOWS THE BEST YOU CAN COME UP WITH. NOTHING -------------- As for PWI, you have harped on this obsessively for 6 months, which is indicative of a severe mental disorder of some sort. --- And in this past exchange (day) here you have harped on the word ALWAYS and one or two edited past sentences. By your own admission that gives you a more severe mental disorder. How does it feel to call yourown self a retard. GOOD ONE YOU REALLY ARE QUITE THE FOOL. -------------- Fact of the matter is I switched from PWI into a trust that has made me more money than if I had continued to hold PWI. ---- I notice how you leave out the key part and just add continue to hold PWI. And not accumulate at the lows lowering ones cost base as my theory clearly shows to do. Of course if you once again change and edit what I have said quite clearly then and only then can you come out ahead. Its sad that you have to resort to such to show your superior. And so clearly doing so too. That all can see it for what it is. MORE OF YOUR TRADING LIES. ------------- ---- The real fact is that you don't show that here or back then either with any sort of real trust trading data BECAUSE YOU CAN'T. Just like you can't counter my own tearing apart your MXT example and now with this more recent example. Here it is more clearly for you. Buy 1000 units at $7. Those units then fall to $5.80. Person A accumulates more, 5000 more units at $6. He now has 6000 units at an average cost of $6.16. The price then rises back to $7. He has 6000 x 7 or $42000 His costs are $37000. He is ahead $5000 or 13.5%. Now person B he panics and sells at $6 Thats a 14% loss. If he gets into another that goes up 25%. Then he is only net ahead on the two 25 - 14 or 11%. 13.5% beats 11%. Person A is clearly the winner. I did all the above with your actual PWI and the AY and PVE that you were in ,in a past post ,and they show the exact same results. PROVING YOU WRONG. AS THE REAL TRADING NUMBERS ALWAYS DO --------- READ IT AND WEEP TRADING SWITCHING LOSER>------------------ You seem to find this very elementary proposition impossible to grasp. So be it. ---- You seem quite unable to grasp elementary math. That proves you SOOOOOO wrong WELL SOOOOOOOOOO BE IT. ------------- TIME TO RUN AWAY AND HIDE NOW LIKE ALL THE OTHER PAST TIMES YOU BRING THIS LITTLE EXCHANGE UP. YOUR WORD GAMES AND TRADING LIES ARE NO MATCH FOR THE REAL HARD FACTS AND THE REAL HARD PAST TRADING NUMBERS. YOU MAKE THIS EASIER AND EASIER EACH TIME--------- I EAGERLY AWAIT THE NEXT TIME-----------

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next