Canadian REITS, Trusts & Dividend Stocks Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Canadian REITS, Trusts & Dividend Stocks

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Lorne Larson who wrote (4344)	9/23/2002 8:53:19 PM
From: Peter W. Panchyshyn	Read Replies (1) of 11633

Interesting that for the last 8 months you've been flapping your big hole about how I made a mistake in selling PWI and switching to another trust. -------- It was a mistake because you didn't have to do it. PETER 6 LORNE 0 That says it all loser------ Now that the numbers prove conclusively that this was the right thing to do, you suddenly claim that this is not your theory. ------ Hardly conclusively how do the numbers support you when clearly buying more at lower prices lowering the average cost base wins out and wins out each time (6). AS PER ALL MY AND YOUR OWN EXAMPLES. YOUR IN TOTAL DENIAL OF THE FACTS AND DATA.------------------- ------ Your the one that posted that my theory said lower your cost base. BUY MORE AT LOWER PRICES. You showed it from one of my past posts. Harped on it, again and again. Now when I show the numbers for lowering the cost base (BUYING MORE) for PWI when it fell and recovered back up beats your switching (13.5% to your 9%) As well as for in all 6 instances LUS, MXT, NCF, ERF, NAE, PWI. Suddenly you cry that I can't use it. WHY??????????? BECAUSE IT JUST SHOWS HOW WRONG YOU ARE. READ THE EVIDENCE AND WEEP. ----------- You know bloody well that when I sold PWI your argument had nothing to do with buying MORE shares of PWI - it had to do with switching from PWI to another trust. --------- The argument you made was against my theory. The theory states quite clearly that you lower the average cost base and you do that by buying more at lower prices. You showed that from my post. Now all of sudden you don't want to acknowledge it because I used it to prove that switching doesnt work like you claim. The time and effort and expense of doing the switching simply does not provide a better return period. ALL 6 cases showed that. You want more. SURELY PETER 6 LORNE 0 is embarrasing enough for you. ----------- ZERO ZERO ZERO ---------- Your such a sore loser its pathetic. ----- I'll link a whole bunch of your wacko posts in this regard as soon as I get a chance. ----- I already posted past posts from the last months like you asked all saying that I accumulate on weakness more lowering my cost base. BY BUYING AT LOWER PRICES Just like the theory said. Just like I do. YOU SAID THERE WERE NONE. YOUR A SORE LOSER LIAR. And I clearly benefit when the unit prices rise because they do that rising over and over again. Thats the gravy of the strategy. The meat is the high monthly income I get each and every month , month after month, year after year. And accumulating means I get more and more of it each time. With the added benefit of that gravy (rise above my average cost base)------ ------- I linked a post telling of using the strategy/theory to increase my investment line of credit. Taking my results straight to the bank each quarter. TRY TAKING YOUR UNDOCUMENTED BUYS AND DOING THE SAME> THEY WOULD GET A REAL LAUGH OUT OF THAT. THEY WOULD ASK LIKE WE ALL HAVE ASKED HERE. WHAT IS YOUR STRATEGY? WHAT IS THE MATH OF IT? WHAT ARE THE DOCUMENTED RESULTS? They like all here have gotten would be a no show from you. JUST CLAIMS WITH NOT ONE BIT OF FACT OR DATA TO BACK THAT UP--------------- YOUR JUST A SORE LOSER TRADER ---------- TOOOO BAAAD FOR YOU.------------ ------- You have expended here a great deal of effort and you still have not proved that switching works well enough. If you have this much time to waste on such a foolish attempt. THEN WHY IS IT THAT YOU HAVE NO TIME TO SHOW BILL WHAT HE REQUESTED ,PAST DATA FOR DIVIDEND STRIPPING THAT SHOWS IT WORKS AND WORKS WELL ENOUGH TO BE WORTH THE EFFORT FOR GLH.UN. OR HOW ABOUT YOU ANSWER RUSSETTS REQUEST TO TRADERS "TO SHOW US ALL HOW IT IS DONE" "" SO THEY CAN LEARN FROM IT"" YOU WONT FOR EITHER OF THOSE BUT YOU WILL DO THIS LAME EFFORT OF YOURS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! THIS ALL SHOWS HOW MUCH YOU WANT TO HELP PEOPLE HERE. AND HOW REALLY UNSUPERIOR YOU AND YOUR RESULTS REALLY ARE.------------------

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next