Foreign Affairs Discussion Group Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: JohnM who wrote (46663)	9/24/2002 3:38:07 PM
From: aladin	Read Replies (1) of 281500

JohnM, ...I'm having a rather large amount of difficulty trying to see how it relates to the present argument about the ME The argument is about intentions. Any amount of evidence appears entirely moot, because you are asking that someone provide something into evidence which ipso facto cannot be proved - the intentions of an action before they occur. You have stated a case that boils down to: no pre-emption. At best you could justify a strike once a launch was detected or after forensic evidence proved beyond any shadow that such an attack originated in Iraq. I don't mean to belittle this position. It has moral clarity - I just disagree. The basis for my disagreement is that our interests extend to regions and countries he can attack - not just the continental US. His proven indirect support of terrorrism such as the arming and financing of terror groups, and the continued financial compensation for Fundamentalists who die while killing Jews or Americans underscores why he must be removed. John

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next