SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Sharks in the Septic Tank

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: epicure who wrote (59712)9/24/2002 7:17:12 PM
From: The Philosopher  Read Replies (2) of 82486
 
I assert that words are interesting enough. I don't care if you have a wife, or a son, or went to St. John's. I really don't. You are interesting whether or not there is any you there. Your posts are ENOUGH.<.i>

It just occurred to me that this is a basic argument in literary criticism. Is or was. I've never been much into literary criticism, but I seem to remember reading that, simplistically, there are two schools, one which believes you need to understand the life of the author in order to understand the work, and the other that believes the work stands alone as a piece of work and should be criticized on its own merits without any reference to the life or experiences of the author.

Anybody know more about this area than I do?
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext