SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes : Clown-Free Zone... sorry, no clowns allowed

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: patron_anejo_por_favor who wrote (193643)9/25/2002 1:18:42 PM
From: Dr. Jeff  Read Replies (1) of 436258
 
Another speech for the history books. The guy should be publicly hung, NOT KNIGHTED - IMO........

Remarks by Chairman Alan Greenspan
At the opening of the new HM Treasury Building, London, U.K.
September 25, 2002

Policy Coordination

Dedication speeches are by their nature forward looking, but lest we believe that in opening this
building we should focus solely on future challenges, I feel the necessity of reminding us all that the
future is not always new.

I myself was reminded of this by an item on the web site of Her Majesty's Treasury. "In 1711," the
item notes, "the Treasury unveiled a scheme to secure government debt by authorising its
subscription into the capital of the South Sea Company--government creditors received stock in
the company. When the South Sea Bubble burst in 1720, however, thousands of investors were
affected and the Chancellor of the Exchequer was sent to the Tower of London." Although the
web site does not elaborate, that eighteenth century chancellor was guilty of dubious practices that
appear eerily contemporary. Fortunately, modern chancellors, including the eminent incumbent,
appear at the Tower these days in a more benign context.

In a more serious vein, I am daily reminded of the special relationship the Federal Reserve has had
over the decades with decisionmakers from the British government. Literally twenty feet from my
desk are plaques commemorating the numerous World War II meetings in our Board Room
between the combined military chiefs of the United States and Great Britain that in the words on
one plaque, "... set the pattern for allied collaboration and the successful prosecution of World
War II."

But the Federal Reserve's association with Britain's monetary authorities goes back even further.
The tie between the Bank of England and the Federal Reserve was cemented during the 1920s in
that extraordinary relationship between Benjamin Strong, the President of the New York Federal
Reserve Bank, and Montague Norman, the Governor of the Bank of England. Their
correspondence yields quite fascinating insight into the way they interpreted events that are now
important history. The ties developed then between the Federal Reserve and British monetary
authorities endure to this day.

The mutual trust reached a point that in 1999 the Bank of England asked Donald Kohn, then head
of our Monetary Affairs Division, and now a governor, to review key aspects of the Bank of
England's monetary policy procedures and make recommendations for improvement. We were
duly impressed because, to us at the Federal Reserve, the Bank of England projects a nearly
mythical presence as the developer of much of the central banking we all practice today.

The Federal Reserve's close relationship with the Bank of England and other major central banks
has been enhanced through periodic meetings at the Bank for International Settlements in Basel
since 1963. But it has been over only the past quarter century, with the emergence of regular
meetings of the finance ministers and central bankers of the Group of Five, and later the Group of
Seven, that interactions between the Federal Reserve and the British Treasury and other major
finance ministries have taken on special importance.

Of course, some of us meet under the auspices of the Organization for Economic Cooperation and
Development, and we all participate in the deliberations of the International Monetary Fund and
the World Bank. But the Group of Seven has surfaced as the most significant forum through which
both finance ministers and central bankers from the major countries coordinate on economic
issues.

International coordination has also been advanced with the creation of the Financial Stability
Forum, an initiative of the G-7 that draws on the Secretariat of the Bank for International
Settlements. And the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision that evolved out of initial
explorations of the Federal Reserve and the Bank of England has broadened international bank
supervisory coordination.

In recent years, both the G-7 and the BIS have reached out to expand our contact with ministers
and governors of developing countries. A new group, the Group of Twenty, encompasses many
industrial countries and a number of developing nations.

Today's remarkably sophisticated international financial system, that all these bodies oversee, took
root several centuries ago within hailing distance of Her Majesty's Treasury. The rule of law and
protection of property rights attracted transactions to the London market and--notwithstanding the
one incident of questionable behavior in 1720 noted earlier--the British tradition of trust, integrity,
and fair dealing has been an important component of the City's success. London, and other British
financial centers, had developed by World War I into the dominant lender to the world,
accounting for half of the world's trade financing and, despite its loss of empire, London remains,
with New York, at the top of the world's financial pyramid.

The City has a long tradition of leading the world in foreign exchange trading and currently
conducts twice the volume of New York despite the fact that the U.S. dollar is the leading traded
currency by far in foreign exchange transactions. London is the world's center for over the counter
derivatives trading--again with double the share of the trading in similar instruments conducted in
New York. Moreover, a substantial share of the world's securities trading is channeled through the
City.

London has stayed on top in the provision of financial services despite the emergence of the euro,
which some expected would divert a significant share of foreign exchange trading to a single center
on the continent. Although financial sector activity in Frankfurt has increased substantially in the
past few years, largely reflecting the growing importance of the euro, trading volumes there are still
well below those of London and New York.

Another potential challenge to the City's prominence in the provision of financial services has been
the telecommunications revolution, which presumably should diminish the need for physical
proximity to conduct financial transactions. If traders can congregate almost anywhere
electronically, we might expect traditional patterns of exchange to be dispersed. However, history,
together with London's long, should I say sterling, reputation as a place to do business, seems to
have spurred market participants to continue to trade through London.

In closing, let me emphasize what a privilege it has been for me to work with Chancellor Brown
and Governor George, who represent the professional best in world finance and who are most
worthy custodians of the financial legacy that Britain has bestowed on the rest of the world.

federalreserve.gov
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext