| You defended an estimate of civilian casualties that would get a D at best if turned in as a research paper, and thought it out of bounds to suggest that bias accounted for the slovenliness. I post material buttressing substantive criticism of the paper, and you dismiss it as not to the point. Then, on this occasion, you take a cheap shot at Bush which turns out to be mistaken on multiple grounds, and when that is pointed out, you get to dismiss that matter as my obsession with mere humor, rather than my disgust over yet another false portrayal of Bush as stupid and Gore as much superior. Then you stupidly suggest that I am proud of more Americans below the poverty level (another lame attempt at humor, I guess), and assert that I have not dealt with substantive issues lately. Actually, I have posted on that topic and many others on the Bush thread in the last few days, I tend to find arguments over here more tedious. You should know that, since you have also been active on the Bush thread. In sum, you can only win an argument over here that you get to judge....... |
