Amazon.com, Inc. (AMZN) Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Amazon.com, Inc. (AMZN)

AMZN 229.54

+0.2%

3:59 PM EST

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Oeconomicus who wrote (148093)	9/25/2002 10:28:36 PM
From: GST	Read Replies (1) of 164684

The only justification for regime change by invasion was and always will be that we cannot tolerate a hostile regime with nuclear capability (and no weapons) in the oil patch. Saddam poses no direct threat to the US -- he only poses a threat to our ability to control the flow of oil from the mideast. An invasion by the USA based on this logic would be blatantly illegal under accepted international law. Regime change by invasion as a policy is and always will be a complete non-starter for the rest of the world. Your "paraphrasing" has nothing to do with what I said and is childish, ignorant and rude.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next