SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Stockman Scott's Political Debate Porch

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: abuelita who wrote (7406)9/26/2002 8:29:23 AM
From: thames_sider  Read Replies (4) of 89467
 
Hmm, Blair's complex, so I'll try and be fair:

- he wants to keep the US thinking of the UK as its staunchest reliable ally (Israel is not precisely reliable...) ~ and yes, there should be some economic/influence quid pro quo

- he genuinely believes in the 'Special Relationship'

- he is a very moral person, and believes that it is the duty of the superpower(s) to enforce world order and punish evil: so he is more, not less, interventionist than Shrub. He may not agree with whatever reasoning Shrub has (connection to 11 Sep? Puh-lease) but if he agrees with the end, then...

- he sees additional power for Britain if it's seen as doing the thinking for Shrub, and/or as the way to get a rational response: and that's the only way Britain keeps anything like the influence it used to have when it really did rule 1/3rd of the world directly by force of arms...

- internal politics (wrongfoots the Tories, they can't disagree so easily as they're currently nearly as RW as Shrub)

- Blair's good at spotting winners and doesn't think Saddam will win this war

My answer is
-- all of the above.
And don't rule out that he may just like the US.

I don't think he's into personal wealth, that's a Tory thing. That's one slur I don't think is relevant here.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext