Adolf Bush wants to get into Iraq before the elections at all cost...why?
I'll tell you why. It's yet another move taken directly out of the Nazi playbook. The American Far Reich is still following their idol, Adolf Hitler, and his group of madmen in the Third Reich.
In 1938, Adolf and company "blitzkrieged" into the Sudetenland and the German people went mad in a "patriotic frenzy" never before seen in the history of the world. The Third Reich then seized total power, took over the last of the free press, and abolished the unions in the name of "national security." The Sudetenland had a tenth rate military and virtually no allies. Even thought Hitler had a massive military advantage over that little country, he also had a "secret" agreement with its military leaders. The agreement was that they would "disappear" when the Nazi attack began, and leave their fellow soldiers totally at the mercy of the Wehrmacht. Of course, that is exactly what did happen, and Adolf became a Demagogic Dictator that would lead his people into total destruction.
Now, the America Reichstag (the House of--right wing--Representatives) and his SA (Stumabteilung-storm troopers) like Cheney (Himmler?) and Rumsfeld (Hermann Goering) are all going flat out to give Der Fuhrer' his dictatorship in the name of "national security." Next, will come the loss of individual rights, in the name of "national security of course, that will be enforced by both the New Era SS (Schutzstaffel-Defense Squads-FBI), and the Bush Boyz CIA (Center of Ignorant Activity--Geheime Staatspolizei-Gestapo); which under the American Far Reich will be disguised under the name of the HSA, "Homeland Security Agency. All of this will take place in the name of "national security," and the American people will go mad in another mass hypnotic frenzy only seen one other time in the history of the world...Nazi Germany in 1938. Well, I shouldn't say "the American people will go mad, " since only 39% will "go mad," another 10% (far right wingers) are already mad (like insane), and the other 51% (the "minority majority") of all Americans will be "disenfranchised" again by the Nicht Oberst Gericht (Un-Supreme Court).
Does any of this sound familiar? This moron and daddy are going out of their skin to get this war going, and it can only be because they already know that the Iraqi military is going to roll over on Sadom.
A famous quote that applies here is: "Those who forget the lessons of history are doomed to repeat it." Since Dumb-ba-ya doesn't know anything, including history, his abc's, or how to count pass twenty without having his shoes off, you can be sure he will repeat it. I predict that the Bush Furher and the American Far Reich will invade the Sudetenland (Iraq), soon, and then will go through 2004 and 2005 riding high by attacking Syria (Rhineland), annexing Canada (Austria) and then starting World War III (in 2006 to 2008) by invading Poland (Saudi Arabia). Of course, if you look at it from his and "pappy's" side: 1) The US won't have to worry about paying for Social Security in 2010...since theere will not be anyone left over the age of sixty-five to collect it, and 2) The Republicans won’t have to worry about stealing ballot boxes in Florida again...since the right to vote will soon be abolished by Der Furher, and the Spanish will have recaptured Florida by the time Bush’s WWIII ends.
The only parallel with Hitler we won't see in the future is a second Mein Kampf (Hitler's book: my struggle), since Bushie Jr. was born with a silver spoon in his mouth (with another one sticking out his better half). He is, also, so stupid that writing anything over the grade of comic book would be virtually impossible for him. Well, I guess, I shouldn't say that. He could always "rehire" those "tutors" who did his work at Yale to plagiarize something else for him. What would the moron call "his" book? Hey, I got it! How about Mein Nicht Kampf (my non struggle), or Lhr Kampf (your struggle)...ho, ho, ho.
I hope all your right wingers (AKA: C I A inhabitants) enjoyed it.
BB423
Dallas, TX USA
Britain fights to restrain US over combative UN resolution
By David Usborne in New York Andrew Grice and Ben Russell
26 September 2002
Internal links
Britain fights to restrain US over combative UN resolution
The common front between Britain and the United States against Iraq was under strain last night as crucial differences emerged over a new UN resolution aimed at resolving the crisis.
Britain has mounted a behind-the-scenes effort to dissuade the White House from seeking a resolution on Iraq that would be so belligerent as to make its passage through the UN Security Council virtually impossible.
President George Bush was expected to sign a draft text for the Security Council's consideration last night or today. But there is anxiety in London that it may overstep what other members, notably France and Russia, would find palatable.
Those fears were heightened today when Russian President Vladimir Putin called for a quick solution to the Iraqi crisis using political and diplomatic means, and suggested no new UN resolutions were necessary.
"We favour a rapid resolution of the situation by political and diplomatic means, on the basis of existing UN Security Council regulations and in line with the principles of international law," Mr Putin said.
"The decision to resume the activities of U.N. inspectors in Iraq opens up the possibility for this decision to be put into action rapidly and allows the concerns of the international community to be allayed."
Tony Blair is determined to secure the unanimous backing of the five permanent members of the Council. He believes that abstentions when demands were last made on Iraq made it easier for Saddam Hussein to flout the UN's will.
Britain is prepared to co-sponsor with the US a tough resolution saying that President Saddam must give UN inspectors full and unfettered access to any sites in Iraq they wish to visit. But divisions have emerged with the Bush administration about how specific the threat of military action should be. One draft warns that any "failure" to comply will result in "international action" under Chapter VII of the UN charter, which provides for military intervention to enforce decisions. However, Britain believes that Russia holds the key to winning unanimous support and is unlikely to back such an open threat of war. London may propose a less explicit motion in the hope of bringing Moscow onside.
Diplomats at UN headquarters in New York warned that an overly aggressive draft resolution could quickly doom all hope of seeing a return of the arms inspectors to Iraq. Such an outcome would have unprecedented diplomatic consequences and leave the US free to pursue war, giving Mr Blair an agonising dilemma over whether to join military action.
"The most crucial task is to get something that all five countries can agree on," one British source said last night. Britain hopes that agreement with the US can be reached by the weekend. A possible compromise is a text that makes it clear to Iraq that war will be the consequence of not co-operating over inspections but which does not seem to give America a pretext at the first sign of trouble. "In no way can it contain triggers that would allow one member state to rush off to war," one Western diplomat warned.
Also from the Politics section.
British dossier is scorned as 'propaganda' |
