Foreign Affairs Discussion Group Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Ilaine who wrote (47434)	9/27/2002 11:06:27 AM
From: Rascal	Read Replies (2) of 281500

<<Mr. Clinton, who is expected to praise Mr. Blair's tough stand against Iraqi leader Saddam Hussein in a major address to thousands of delegates at the conference. Good. Finally, a high-ranking Democrat who is willing to be consistent with the stand he took in the past. >> This is sooo funny. Why wouldn't Blair want Bush or Cheney or Rice or Rumsfeld? Hmmm. So to win over the majority of the English people who are not convinced by Bush and Blair.. Blair invites THE Discredited Clinton who we all know lied under oath and broke the rule of law. Why would he choose such a rascal when he can have BUsh, who has brought a new tone in Washington? This is sooo sweet, I have to stare into space for about an hour contemplating the cognitive dissonance you all must be having. Rasacal@howsweetitis.com PS have any of you ever had a job or been accountable or responsible for something and said: "We are going to do this" and when asked why or how or when, then come up with a different answwers and reasons everyday for 3 months? Did you keep your job? Whatever happened to 1 Objective 2 Strategy 3 Tactics

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next