Foreign Affairs Discussion Group Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: tekboy who wrote (47481)	9/27/2002 1:12:46 PM
From: carranza2	Read Replies (1) of 281500

I suppose if I were confident that it would be done Pollack's way, I'd be in favor. How about a hint as to what is "Pollack's way" for those of us who don't have present access to the book? These are deeply serious questions of the utmost importance, and neither the pro- nor anti-invasion case is a slam-dunk. It all comes down (as these things so often do) to tough judgment calls about the relative risks and costs of various unpleasant options. Agreed. Paradoxically, I've become a bit more of a fence sitter when I discuss the issue than when I post about it. The ultimate point that sways me in favor of invasion is the prospect of Saddam armed not with one or two untested nukes but with twenty or thirty, followed by a successful above ground test. It's a world-changing scenario we cannot afford to have occur.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next