SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Intel Corporation (INTC)
INTC 48.32-0.8%Jan 15 3:59 PM EST
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: THE WATSONYOUTH who wrote (171324)9/28/2002 3:48:45 AM
From: tcmay  Read Replies (2) of 186894
 
"It is clear that multiple aliases (some used interchangeably by different individuals) were used by these people in an attempt to manipulate public opinion. Do you agree that using multiple aliases is an attempt to manipulate public opinion and is grounds for immediate permanent suspension from SI and furthermore would be strongly discouraged by Intel (the company) if it knew any of its employees were practicing it on investment threads? "

Let's get something straight: a name is whatever a person or entity uses. Talk of "official names" when there is never any checking of names, of who "TPGPRETHTNDR" is, or who "Choomolunga" is, or even who "Elmer Phud" is...this all means that nonsense about "multiple names" is just that, nonsense.

SI has never required "proof of names." The Net in general lacks the infrastructure to do this (and even if it had it, I have multiple IDs.) I was never asked in any way to prove any of my screen names, which SI was once handing out like popcorn. I registered in 1996, I registered a while later, and I registered more recently. And so on.

If they can prove that I have used multiple names, they may do as they wish. If they falsely accuse me, though, then I will be justified in how I will respond.

We who are fighting the evil of AMD must use what we can. AMD is a charade organization. Intel must drive it out of business. CRUSH II is on schedule.

--A User
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News