Foreign Affairs Discussion Group Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: jcky who wrote (47699)	9/28/2002 12:32:16 PM
From: epsteinbd	Read Replies (1) of 281500

Far from convincing on Sharon versus Arafat. Barak said last week on US tv that had he been PM; his responses to terror would have been harsher than Sharon's. Nataniahou, for months, advocates shipping Arafat on his Karine A. A Palestinian state hasn't always been on the agenda of all Israeli PM for sure, but in the last 11 years, all were more than willing to get a deal, a deal both sides can claim they won, at best. Sharon said time and again he was ready for painful concessions. It is simplistic to imagine that he does not have a clear picture of the situation, that he is hung up by some military success he had etc. Hey, this guy doesn't even believe in the existence of the god of the Jews. So what else is sacred for him besides life and peace ?

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next