Foreign Affairs Discussion Group Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Hawkmoon who wrote (47852)	9/29/2002 4:44:35 AM
From: maceng2	Read Replies (3) of 281500

The guys says whatever is most politically expedient I think he will lose a lot of ground with Bush that way. Although the war with Iraq looked as if it had a favorable conclusion, hindsight tells us the job was not finished properly. A lot of mistakes were made since then, and what ever fingers can be pointed at Bush, a lot more could be pointed at the Clinton administration. It's my belief also that this is not about oil. Before 9/11 Bush was going to focus a lot more on domestic policy then contemplating any war with Iraq. Just read any news article pre 9/11. The Guardian maybe a left wing news paper but it has an excellent search facility. guardian.co.uk That has all changed now. Oil companies might see this as an opportunity for them, but the political situation means they will have to be on their best behaviour. I think Putin has some ideas in Iraq too. Interesting Turkey election update eurasianet.org

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next