Foreign Affairs Discussion Group Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Bilow who wrote (48183)	9/30/2002 10:25:19 AM
From: Hawkmoon	Read Replies (2) of 281500

One option to contain Saddam at that stage would be to supply Kuwait, Saudi Arabia or Iran with nukes. Not on your life... :0) Another option would be for those countries to allow the US to station soldiers (with nukes) in their territory. Possible.. But isn't the whole basis for the Bin Laden's appeal to the "arab street" in that he opposed Saudi Arabiap permitting "infidels" to station their troops in their holy country?? Personally, I don't want the US to be forced to engage in another long lasting face off such as we endured during the cold war.. And I certainly don't want to have to do it in the Middle East. Do you know how hard it will be recruit young American boys with visions of long, sweltering days in the Desert sun?? Because this ain't Germany... (which we still don't want to leave.. hehe).. Their ain't no Alps... only sand dunes... And there ain't no beer, or Oktoberfest, or lederhosen... Just desalinated water, daily calls to prayer, and black veils... And after last night's 60 minutes, you're going to have a hard time getting the American people to make a long term committment toward stationing tens of thousands of troops there. Hawk

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next