SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes : Clown-Free Zone... sorry, no clowns allowed

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Knighty Tin who wrote (194546)10/1/2002 2:00:39 PM
From: Knighty Tin  Read Replies (1) of 436258
 
Hey, worst quarterly index performance since 1987. Best index YTD is the Russell 2500 Value, which I'd never heard of before, down 14.49%. Worst is the Naswacky, down 39.91% (way to hold the line at 40%, Naz <G>). Of course, we don't count commodities of any sort for you yellar dog fans.

For the past 5 years, the S&P 500 has averaged a negative 1.63%, and that includes the bubble years of 1997-early 2000. The Nasdaq a negatory 7.01% a year. The common wisdom of buy and hold indices was a bit too common and a bit too unwise.

Here's the tidbit that interested me the most. Again, most folks think that if you didn't own tech during the bubble, you were, as I was often called, a "looser." 10 years on the Nasdaq, a positive 7.01%. Long Treasury Bond Index, a positive 9.12%. But, according to academics, the Treasury bond buyers must have taken more risk to achieve that superior performance. Makes my stomach hurt from laughing.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext