As our nation talks of launching an attack on Iraq, some courageous souls in Congress have questioned the wisdom of this policy. Nineteen of them have formed a coalition in the House. Their goal? To halt a congressional resolution--slated for a vote in less than two weeks--to hand the President enormous military powers. One senator has likened it to a "blank check" to conduct a war anywhere, at any time, in the Middle East.
Though few have dared to join this band of independent thinkers, the mavericks believe they can turn the momentum. If the U.S. would adopt a more imaginative approach, whether dealing with Iraq or other countries, they maintain, we could resolve the situation overseas without inciting more bloodshed in a volatile region. This is an exciting development!
These remarkable legislators need to hear from us TODAY. They have risked political suicide to save us from ourselves. When I phoned the office of one of them, Rep. Jim McDermott of Washington, his staffer was delighted at the positive feedback. "We've had a couple hundred calls," he confided. I was stunned. Hundreds? That's it?? The man should be getting thousands, hundreds of thousands, even millions. Enough messages of encouragement, solidarity, and gratitude to shut down all the switchboards on Capitol Hill.
I'm sending you a list of some of the players in this drama. Please call, fax, or e-mail them immediately. Thank them for ignoring the drumbeat of war and shifting the emphasis to constructive dialogue. A few will accept e-mail from outside their district; most prefer calls or faxes. Also urge your local media (print, radio, TV) to cover this story. Americans deserve to be informed. This isn't "anti-war"--it's "pro-sanity"!
Thanks for spreading the word...
Yours in peace & hopefulness, CC
October 1
SENATOR JOSEPH BIDEN, JR. (Delaware) Chairman of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee Coauthored a commentary in the New York Times about the drawbacks of military engagement in Iraq and the need for an open and immediate discussion of our objectives before engaging in war. (read more at www.nytimes.com/2002/07/31/opinion/31BIDE.html) 202-224-5042 (ph); 202-224-0139 (fx) senator@biden.senate.gov (was malfunctioning over the weekend--with luck it's back in service) At the Senate Foreign Relations Committee: 202-224-4651 (ph); 202-228-3612 (fx)
SENATOR RICHARD LUGAR (Indiana) Ranking minority member of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee Coauthor, with Senator Biden, of the article in the New York Times 202-224-4814 (ph); 202-228-0360 (fx) senator_lugar@lugar.senate.gov
SENATOR RUSSELL FEINGOLD (Wisconsin) Has strenuously objected to the language of the proposed resolution that would give the President what amount to blanket powers to attack other nations. Says the resolution "appears to actually authorize the president to do virtually anything anywhere in the Middle East." 202-224-5323 (ph) Or e-mail him at feingold.senate.gov
REP. JIM MCDERMOTT (Washington) Is spearheading the drive in the House of Representatives to oppose military action in Iraq. "There are a lot of us who think the American people are getting only one point of view," he says. "...We need to give people a chance to know what their alternatives are." And: "I strongly believe we must first exhaust all diplomatic channels before we commit U.S. servicemen and women to a potentially protracted and costly conflict. ...It would also inflame anti-U.S. extremism throughout the region, and set a dangerous precedent that other countries might follow." (read more at www.house.gov/mcdermott/pr020912_response_to_bush_un.htm) 202-225-3106; 202-225-6197 (fx)
REP. DENNIS KUCINICH (Ohio) Another leader, with McDermott, of the House coalition that hopes to avert a U.S. war with Iraq. He is disturbed that "the country which I love so much" is talking about unilateral attacks, assassinations, and more, adding, "This is not an America that I recognize." And: "There is no imminent threat by Iraq against the United States. Iraq does not have nuclear capabilities that anyone has been able to specifically determine... Oil is a factor. How much [of a factor] is anybody's guess...after all, it is the second largest oil supply in the world." And: "[Domestic issues like the economy] are the immediate threat to America's security. Iraq is a handy diversion." (read more at www.rense.com/general29/sdoi.htm) 202-225-5871 (ph); 202-225-5745 (fx)
REP. MARCY KAPTUR (Ohio) "Naked aggression is not the American way," she has said about a preemptive strike against Iraq 202-225-4146 (ph); 202-225-7711 (fx) REP.KAPTUR@mail.house.gov
REP. JOHN MURTHA (Pennsylvania) Has serious qualms about our rush to start a war 202-225-2065 (ph) murtha@mail.house.gov
REP. PETER DEFAZIO (Oregon) Thinks the President is obsessed with "old business"--i.e., his father's campaign against Saddam Hussein 202-225-6416 (ph)
REP. SHEILA JACKSON LEE (Texas) She's hopeful that House Republicans will work with Democrats in this effort 202-225-3816; 202-225-3317 (fx) tx18@mail.house.gov
REP. BERNIE SANDERS (Vermont) Believes that others would claim the right to mimic our preemptive first strike, causing "international anarchy" (read more at bernie.house.gov 202-225-4115 (ph); 202-225-6790 (fx) bernie@mail.house.gov
REP. TAMMY BALDWIN (Wisconsin) Opposes a unilateral first strike against Iraq "in the absence of evidence"...favors "working with our allies and other nations" to deal with weapons of mass destruction...believes we must give "weapons inspectors a chance...before concluding they have failed"...cosigned two letters to the President "cautioning against expansion of the war on terrorism beyond Afghanistan" 202-225-2906 (ph); 225-6942 (fx) Or e-mail her at tammybaldwin.house.gov
REP. SAM FARR (California) A member of the newly formed House coalition (there are FIVE from California!) 202-225-2861 (ph); 202-225-6791 (fx)
REP. BOB FILNER (California) He's feeling the heat in his district, which is home to many armed services personnel & retirees 202-225-8045 (ph); 202-225-9073 (fx)
REP. BARBARA LEE (California) Has introduced H.R. 473, a resolution calling for the U.S. to work through the U.N. AND opposing unilateral first-strike military action! (Remember that she also cast the ONLY vote in Congress against retaliating in Afghanistan for the 9/11 attacks.) (read about it at www.house.gov/lee/releases/02Sept18.htm) 202-225-2661 (ph); 202-225-9817 (fx) Barbara.Lee@mail.house.gov
REP. DIANE WATSON (California) A member of the newly formed coalition 202-225-7084 (ph); 202-225-2422 (fx)
REP. LYNN WOOLSEY (California) Mail and calls from her constituents are running 200-to-1 against a war with Iraq! She says they're asking, "Where...is the opposition?" 202-225-5161 (ph); 202-225-5163 (fx) |