Attack Iraq? Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Attack Iraq?

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: GROUND ZERO™ who wrote (1987)	10/3/2002 11:25:50 AM
From: sandeep	Read Replies (1) of 8683

He is history. There is no compromise with him. Totally onboard. However, to institute a democracy in Iraq afterwards MUST be the goal. From now on, US shouldn't pre-emptively attack any country without the end goal of installing a democracy. With that in mind, we need other nations who can help out in democracy-building. The compromise is with them. The compromise can be that there will be an automatic meeting to discuss the violation and decision will be taken right away. I think that if there are 100 rules specified and some really minor one is broken, should we really attack Iraq on that basis? I think prudence like a second resolution makes sense. I bring this up only because Bush went to the UN. He didn't have to - he could have attacked based on prior violations. However, it is common courtesy to give one last warning...

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next