SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: TigerPaw who wrote (303757)10/3/2002 1:24:04 PM
From: Skywatcher  Read Replies (2) of 769670
 
and of course the record is clear on what W and Norton are doing to protect US here at home....
NOTHING!
Rep. Markey Releases Study Showing Big Drop in EPA Policing
By Glen Johnson
Boston Globe

Tuesday, 1 October, 2002

WASHINGTON - Enforcement of the nation's environmental laws has fallen precipitously under the Bush
administration, US Representative Edward J. Markey, Democrat of Malden, said yesterday.

Markey asked Christie Whitman, head of the Environmental Protection Agency, to return to much
higher enforcement levels seen during the Clinton administration.

A study by Markey's staff showed a huge decline in costs to polluters resulting from EPA enforcement.
Using the agency's data, the study found that the total amount of penalties and remedies for EPA
administrative actions in the first 14 months of the Bush administration fell 80 percent from the total
recovered during the last 131/2 months of the Clinton administration, from $845.1 million to $165.1 million.

The average settlement cost of those EPA administrative actions fell by 63 percent, from $234,000 to
$87,000, in the periods examined in the study.

The staff also looked at a three-month period under both the Clinton and Bush presidencies - from Feb.
20 to July 20 in 2000 and 2002 - and found similar results.

''I am concerned that the dramatic reduction in numbers of and settlements for EPA Administrative
Actions taken during the Bush Administration could lead polluting companies to conclude that it pays to
pollute and that there is no incentive to stop,'' said a statement Markey released.

''Just as weak oversight of corporate accounting led directly to misleading and fraudulent investment
disclosure by companies like Enron, weak enforcement of our environmental laws will lead directly to rising
pollution, tainted water supplies and dirty air,'' he said. ''It is unacceptable for the new EPA menu to have
plenty of specials for polluters, but leftovers for the families who must live next to polluting facilities.''

An EPA spokesman did not return a phone call seeking comment on the analysis.

The Markey study - titled ''Does Polluting Pay at the Bush EPA?'' - focused on cases launched and
concluded within the two administrations. Administrative actions include cases that are handled internally
by the EPA or by an arbitrator, as opposed to judicial actions, which require intervention by the courts.

Markey, a nuclear energy opponent who serves on the House Energy and Commerce Committee,
asked for stiffer enforcement of environmental laws in a letter to Whitman, the EPA administrator.

''Businesses that fully comply with federal environmental laws are harmed when those who fail to
comply are not subject to enforcement action,'' Markey wrote. ''If the laws are not enforced, dishonest
competitors can put honest businesses out of business simply by continuing to pollute while avoiding the
expenses associated with preventing pollution that are incurred by honest competitors.''
CC
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext