RE:Les French/Zwebner-> By: the_worm06
26 Sep 2002, 04:25 PM EDT Msg. 6750 of 6752
ATTEMPTED BLACKMAIL OF A WITNESS IN A LAWSUIT:
August 30, 2000: Portland, Ore. Last week, I was publicly attacked as the target of a vicious, malicious, and fraudulent character assassination and smear campaign, calculated to destroy my public reputation, by publishing utterly false and defamatory statements regarding my personal history and reputation. The attack was directed not only at myself, but calculated to harm and injure members of my personal family, including minor children, and business and community associates.
The identity of at least two of the perpetrators of this attack are known to me, one is the board chairman and defacto CEO of a tiny public company, Talk Visual Corporation, while the other individual is a lawyer which has acted as an attorney for both the company and the board chairman. The stated purpose of this attack was to destroy both myself, and the Foundation.
This assault began with a series of vulgar ¡§warning¡¨ messages published on the internet by Talk Visual¡¦s chairman, Michael Joel Zwebner, and directed at myself. The timing of this planned campaign was such that I was to testify on September 21, 2000 in the case of Zwebner v. Villasenor. In lock step with the online messages, I received two emails from one of Zwebner¡¦s attorneys, Mark O. Van Wagoner, insisting that Van Wagoner had ¡§come into possession¡¨ of information that was ¡§personal¡¨ to me that we should discuss. He requested that I fly down to southern California, or he would come to Portland, to meet personally.
On Tuesday, August 22, Van Wagoner did telephone me in Portland. What ensued was a 22-minute conversation which was generally cordial, albeit vague. In the conversation, Van Wagoner proposed that he had a ¡§thick file¡¨ on me, and made the following statements:
„h "I have come into a large volume of information, which if I were in your position, I would not think I would want it to come out in the litigation"
„h ..."it is public information, and it is likely to become generally more public..."
„h "I have a picture of you with a booking number underneath it, I have the whole file"
„h "That's the reason for my call: only to talk you about if that changes how you wish to proceed in this litigation."
„h "If I take your deposition, and when I take it, these things will become exhibits in the deposition, they are already public record."
„h "Are you willing to sacrifice yourself for them? [Zwebner and Talk Visual Corp.]"
„h "If what has come into my possession is of no consequence to you in how you wish to proceed in dealing with Mr. Zwebner, just tell me now; if it is, then we need to decide what and how and what difference it makes; otherwise, I go forward in what I've been doing for twenty-five years."
At the end of the conversation, I was given a couple hours to ¡§think about it¡¨, or else Van Wagoner was going to go ahead with whatever his intentions were. Unfortunately, the lawyer¡¦s comments were so vague and non-descriptive, that I was totally unaware of what Van Wagoner was talking about, and what his intentions were. Furthermore, I was even more unaware and unprepared for the false, fraudulent, and malicious attack that Zwebner was about to make on the internet and in his company¡¦s press releases, and for the fraudulent statements and fraudulent documents that his proxies were about to publish online.
Michael Zwebner is a person who masterfully bends and twists the truth to mislead investors and the public. But sometimes, and this is one of those times, he engages in out-right manufactured lies, in a desperate attempt to destroy his target: for I am told that he has engaged in character assassination attempts against others.
Consider the case of Roberto Villasenor, the online publisher who is presently the defendant in Zwebner¡¦s latest of many lawsuits against online critics. Shortly after Villasenor was sued by Talk Visual Corporation for criticizing the company¡¦s financials, a southern California psychiatrist, using the online account alias of ¡§DocKatz¡¨ began posting numerous false, malicious, and defamatory claims against Villasenor of the most vulgar magnitude, including calling Villasenor ¡§a convicted child molester¡¨. One wonders where Katz receives his information, and why a practicing physician would engage in such abusive behavior? It turns out that Katz was a recipient on Zwebner¡¦s ¡§inner circle¡¨ email list, and a frequent correspondent with Zwebner. Katz even claims that he introduced Talk Visual Corporation to several potential business partners.
THESE ARE DESPERATE PEOPLE who do not want to make disclosure to the investing public. Their only ¡§defense¡¨ is to attack the critics who have raised legitimate questions regarding their financial activities. These disclosures ARE REQUIRED for officers and principals of publicly traded companies. Zwebner has never told the truth regarding his bankruptcy history, and has never answered charges from critics regarding his dealings with Anthony Heller and other insiders and insider transactions.
I, on the other hand, am a private citizen, and have NO obligation to disclose anything to anyone. I do not ask you for your money. I am not selling investments or promoting stocks. I am an unpaid volunteer and director for the Foundation. Nonetheless, following is a full a complete disclosure of private matters which will refute every allegation made by Zwebner.
On August 22, 2000, I received a phone call from a member of Zwebner¡¦s legal team, Mark Van Wagoner, who is pro hoc vice assisting the Bingham Dana lead attorneys in Zwebner¡¦s frivolous lawsuit against Villasenor. During the call, Van Wagoner threatened me that depending upon how I proceeded in the Villasenor lawsuit, a file of materials he had in his possession would make its way to the internet. I had until 3 o¡¦clock to respond as to how I wanted to proceed.
The next day, August 23, Zwebner published a series of hateful, defamatory, false, and fraudulent posts, aimed entirely at destroying my public reputation. In his attack, Zwebner stated ¡§these are real facts obtained from US Government court records.¡¨ He then posted two links to another web page, the author and publisher of which are presently unknown at this time. Zwebner then made the following false, fraudulent, and defamatory statements: ¡§What is he? Let me tell you clearly, he is a:
Convicted child molester
Convicted of forcing his wife to have forced sex against her will
Convicted of restraining her in bed against her will
Convicted of restraining her from going to the bathroom
Convicted wife beater, French hit his wife on stomach while she was pregnant¡¨
Each and every one of these statements is false, manufactured by Zwebner, and has no basis in fact. The Plain Truth is that in May of 1996, I pled no contest to a misdemeanor charge of assault, relating to a disciplinary action with a minor child. While I disagreed with the charge, my decision was, that it was cheaper to pay a $500 fine and have a probation period with 40 hours of community service, than arguing with the authorities and spending thousands of dollars going to trial. There was no restraining order as falsely alleged by Zwebner.
I cannot think of anything worse than being falsely called ¡§a convicted child molester¡¨. Let me be perfectly clear: I have never been accused of such a thing, let alone convicted! In fact, I have never been convicted of any crime, except for the misdemeanor described above. No court has EVER ordered that I am ¡§restrained from being near¡¨, or not have contact with children, that I am ¡§restrained from coming close to wife¡¨ (or any other person), that I am or have ever been on parole (which is impossible, since I have never been jailed or imprisoned), or that any court or any ¡§parole officer¡¨ (or anyone else) ever recommended, or ever ordered, any ¡§mental health treatment¡¨.
The author of the web pages which were cited and linked to by Zwebner, has deceitfully combined and mixed up the single valid court document referencing the misdemeanor I described above, with a series of false and fraudulent documents, causing the reader to infer these were in fact the same document.
The remaining documents are false and fraudulent. Someone purporting to be my former wife petitioned the court for a ¡§restraining order¡¨ based on false allegations. Some of the allegations are fraudulent on their face: for example, the document makes the allegation that I hit my wife in the stomach when she was pregnant, within six months of the signing of the petition. This is preposterous, since the same document discloses that our youngest child (and Mrs. French¡¦s last pregnancy) was 12 years old at that time. The other allegations are equally ridiculous. This document was so questionable on its face, that the ex parte judge who was on duty at the time denied the petitioner¡¦s request for even a temporary restraining order, requiring instead that the parties should be served and given an opportunity for a hearing. I doubt that Mrs. French was ever aware of the existence of these documents.
Until Zwebner published these false and fraudulent documents, I had never seen them before. Let me make myself perfectly clear: I did not, have not, and would never strike an innocent person for any reason, and especially my own wife and children. Zwebner knows the difference between an dubious accusation and a conviction, but has no problem asserting a lie to the public if it advances his purpose. His reckless disregard for the truth has caused pain and injury to members of my family, and to associates.
Now I have made full disclosure. Will Mr. Zwebner do the same? What is the truth regarding his bankruptcy history? When was his bankruptcy discharged? What is his, and TVCP¡¦s, relationship with Anthony Heller? How did Zwebner, in addition to Heller, beneficially become a preferred shareholder in TVCP? Who has been dumping millions and millions of shares of TVCP stock on the market during the past several months, while internet touters urge investors to ¡§hold long¡¨?
Since August 23 when Zwebner attempted his character assassination on me, I have received several letters from Zwebner and his attorney Van Wagoner, which you can now read online. But let me warn you: if you are offended by obscenities, and bantering at the level of a six-year old, then don¡¦t go there. These messages betray the true character and nature of the chairman of Talk Visual Corporation!
Les L. French
Public messages from TVCP chairman Michael J. Zwebner prior to the phone conversation with Van Wagoner:
By: MICHAELJ123 $$$$
Reply To: 74964 by InternetZorro $$$ Tuesday, 22 Aug
2000 at 2:06 AM EDT
Post # of 75156
INTERNETZORRO
WHEN I WAS A LITTLE BOY, I WENT TO SCHOOL IN LONDON.
MY TEACHER TAUGHT ME :
PEOPLE IN GLASS HOUSES SHOULDNT THROW STONES !
DO YOU LINE IN A GLASS HOUSE ?
IS YOUR HOUSE HELD UP WITH LARGE GLASS SLABS ? WHAT WOULD HAPPEN IF THE GLASS WERE SHATTERED AND PEOPLE ON THE OUTSIDE COULD LOOK DEEP INTO THE INSIDE
???
THAT WOULD CHANGE THINGS, NOW WOULDNT IT !
REMEMBER APRIL 2000, - ''' LET THE PARTY BEGIN ''' !
CALL MY ATTORNEY AND SET UP THE MEETING.... JUST MYADVICE YOU HAVE LASS THAN 24 HOURS LEFT.
MICHAEL
By: MICHAELJ123 $$$$
Reply To: 75232 by InternetZorro $$$ Tuesday, 22 Aug
2000 at 11:54 AM EDT
Post # of 75334
INTERNETZORRO
ITS USELESS TO TRY TO ANSWER YOUR TWISTED AND FALSE
STATEMENTS, AS ALL YOU DO IS TAKE MY RESPONSES AND
TWIST THEM YET AGAIN.
PERHAPS THE ONLY ALTERNATIVE IS TO LET THE PUBLIC KNOW
WHO YOU ''REALLY'' ARE AND WHAT YOU ARE ALL ABOUT.
AS I TOLD YOU YESTERDAY, THE CLOCK IS TICKING, AND YOU
HAVE LESS THAN 12 HOURS TO MEET MY ATTORNEY !
MICHAEL
By: MICHAELJ123 $$$$
Reply To: 75272 by munchman $$$ Tuesday, 22 Aug 2000
at 2:04 PM EDT
Post # of 75387
MUNCHMAN
unlike others, I can take critisism, and I do listen
to my shareholders. The issues here are much deeper
than you and others are aware.
I can assure you that withing a very few days, this
whole INTERNETZORRO / LES FRENCH matter will either be
resolved or I will be forced to fully expose these
animals for what they are. HUMAN FILTH, nothing else.
When I have told all the shareholders and revealed in
detail what these filthy animals are all about, the
cross accusations, and discussions in my opinion will
be over.
The case will shut as abruptly as it opened. !
Thank you and all the others for your support.
Michael
By: MICHAELJ123 $$$$
Reply To: 75353 by InternetZorro $$$$ Tuesday, 22 Aug
2000 at 2:27 PM EDT
Post # of 75401
FRENCH
YOU ARE TOO LATE....
SEVERAL OF YOUR ""FRIENDS"" RATTED YOU OUT ALREADY !
YOU SEE, WHEN YOU LIVE IN THE SEWER, YOU ARE
SURROUNDED BY RATS.... AND WHEN THE BAIT IS SET, THEY
ALL COME RUNNING.
ITS THAT SIMPLE !
NOW, REMEMBER WHAT I TOLD YOU, 6 HOURS TO GO... CALL
TO MEET MY ATTORNEY IMMEDIATLY, OR ALL THE
SHAREHOLDERS ON RAGING BULL, SILICON LINES, AOL, ETC,
ALL OVER THE WORLD WILL GET TO KNOW THE ""REAL"" LES
FRENCH, WHAT HE LOOKS LIKE, WHAT HE IS ALL ABOUT, IN
GRAPHIC DETAIL AND IN GLORIOUS TECHNICOLOR !
YOU LOWEST OF LOWEST OF SCUM !
MICHAEL
By: MICHAELJ123 $$$$
Reply To: None Tuesday, 22 Aug 2000 at 2:41 PM EDT
Post # of 75515
And WORM,
I read what you say about support from the JD board.
I'm really sorry to now have to shatter your myth.
when you find out what your "supporter" French is all
about, you too will come running for cover. He took
you and all of us for a ride, till we did some real
research and came up with some shocking truths.
The JD board is run by a person that is without doubt
the worst type of human species ever to have been
brought to society.
French...... 5 hours and 25 minutes.
Call my attorney.....
Michael
../assets/multimedia/vanwag82200.ram../assets/multimedia/vanwag82200.ram
Several minutes after the last message above appeared, I received a phone call from one of Zwebner¡¦s attorneys, Mark Van Wagoner. Click on the icon to the left to listen to this call (about 22 minutes - requires Real Player).
About twelve hours after the phone call from Van Wagoner, the following false, defamatory, and fraudulent public messages were posted by TVCP¡¦s chairman Michael Zwebner:
By: MICHAELJ123 $$$$
Reply To: 75629 by shutupndeal $$$ Wednesday, 23 Aug
2000 at 2:22 AM EDT
Post # of 75635
IMPORTANT ANNOUNCEMENT
To all shareholders and investors.
I have struggled to understand the reasons for the
hatred and venom spewed by a group of deceptive
Internet posters whom I¡¦ve never met and, if one is to
believe them, have no monetary interest in the company
I head. I do not enjoy responding to these obsessed
souls who spend their resources attacking me and
defaming me with the claim of "doing due diligence" to
aid the TVCP shareholders."
To the contrary, I feel certain that they are trying
to destroy the company, and my life by making nonstop
false and malicious allegations on the net, and
broadcasting them on various chat lines.
To advance their agenda, these troubled individuals
have formed a "club" of John Does, whose admission to
the club requires that they have been sued for their
posts. On this self congratulatory site they boast
that they are acting in the interests of free speech,
and the protection of the privacy of individuals.
Because you are his audience, I have decided that all
you shareholders and investors are FULLY entitled to
know in detail the quality of the posters that claim
to be trying to protect you in your investments in
TVCP (and others)
These are the folks that are claiming free speech,
claiming privacy of individuals, and claiming to be
acting in YOUR interest.
I will start with LES LEIGH FRENCH. Self proclaimed
leader and inventor of the JD Board, and the John Does
society.
He is nothing like he claims to be.
THIS IS THE REAL LES FRENCH, THE REAL INTERNETZORRO.
Do not be misled by others, here is the link to THE
COURT DOCUMENTS. This is NOT my invention, THESE ARE
REAL FACTS OBTAINED FROM US GOVERNEMNT COURT RECORDS.
LINKS THAT SHOW HIM FOR WHAT HE REALLY IS.
WHAT IS HE ? LET ME TELL YOU CLEARLY, HE IS A:
Convicted child molester
Convicted of forcing his wife to have forced sex
against her will
Convicted of restraining her in bed against her will
Convicted of restraining her from going to the
bathroom
Convicted wife beater, French hit his wife on stomach
while she was pregnant.
Court ordered : restrained from being near children
Court ordered : restrained from coming close to wife
Court ordered : on parole
Court ordered : ordered to do community service,
Court ordered : fines
Court ordered : parole officer recommended
"mental health treatment"
HE IS A CONVICTED CHILD MOLESTER, TO NONE OTHER THAN
HIS OWN CHILD. HE BEAT HIS OWN WIFE WHILE PREGNANT,
HITTING HER ON HER STOMACH, ATTACKING HIS OWN CHILD. !
Ladies and Gentlemen, there is more, much more, but I
am too sick to even think about it. This is one of the
worst individuals I have ever come across.
AND THIS PERSON CLAIMS TO REPRESENT FREEDOM OF SPEECH,
RIGHTS OF PRIVACY FOR INDIVIDUALS, WHERE ARE THE
RIGHTS OF WILLIAM FRENCH, OR LINDA FRENCH, OF YOUR
THEN UNBORN CHILD.
FRENCH, YOU DISGUST US ALL, I AM SICK TO THE STOMACH
THINKING OF YOU.
Mr. Les Leigh French will pay dearly for all the
misery he is causing. !
I rest my case, I now hand it over to my attorneys,
and when this example of human sickness is finally
dealt with, I will report to you.
Michael Zwebner
By: MICHAELJ123 $$$$
Reply To: 75631 by MICHAELJ123 $$$$ Wednesday, 23 Aug
2000 at 2:33 AM EDT
Post # of 75637
AND MY FINAL MESSAGE TO THE WORM
BE CAREFUL OF FRENCH, YOU THINK HE IS GOING TO HELP
YOU, WELL THINK AGAIN, HE MIGHT JUST...... YOU....
GO FIND A BETTER ORGANIZATION TO HELP YOU, THE JD
BOARD AND WHAT IT REPRESENTS IS HISTORY.
MICHAEL ZWEBNER
By: B.I.G. $$$$
Reply To: None Thursday, 24 Aug 2000 at 11:28 AM EDT
Post # of 76169
Must read ...Michael zwebner reponds to email
questions
I thank you for your emails.
Over the past week or so, we have seen the PERSONAL
litigation of myself vs Villasenor / French et al
expose itself to the public. I personally regret even
having to post at all on Raging Bull, but I was
innundated with emails from shareholders demanding
replies to the false and defamatory statements put out
by French/Internetzorro, particularly after the
release of some of my personal email addresses. This
was thanks to an "insider friend" who maliciously sent
a copy of the email to French just to cause trouble
and score points with this despicable person. While it
really upset me, (because I considered this person a
friend) I learned a lesson, and in due course, they
too will learn their lesson, and they will find out
that betraying a friend for personal vindictiveness
can and will cost them dearly.
I, as a result of the pressure from shareholders, was
left with no option but to "go public" and expose
these sick people for what they are, and to show the
shareholders the "true credibility" of these animals.
I can confirm that my attorneys, together with law
enforcement are now looking and addressing this whole
situation, and they will no doubt take whatever action
is needed to put a stop to these people and their
disgraceful posts. My personal aim is ensure that we
completely close out and shut down the JD board, and
what it truly stands for; lies, deceipt, false
defamatory allegations etc. Looking and reading some
of the recent postings there, makes it plain and
obvious that this site has NO place in our civilized
society.
* * *
Then, after I first published the 22-minute phone call, which many commented after listening to it, was a ¡§blackmail¡¨ threat, Van Wagoner responded to me in the following emails. Notice in the third message, that Van Wagoner is unable to prevent himself from joining in on his client¡¦s false, malicious mud-slinging:
From: Mark Van Wagoner "
To: "'barter@lesfrench.com'" "
Copies to: "Heidi A Nadel (E-mail)" ,",
"Mark W Batten (E-mail)" ,",
"michael zwebner (E-mail)" "
Subject: Defamation
Date sent: Thu, 24 Aug 2000 10:30:55 -0700
Dear Mr. French:
According to your companion, Mr. Villasenor, you intend to make a public claim that I "blackmailed" you.
As you clearly know, that would be false and would be done with specific intent to injure me.
I have seen your reckless behavior in the past and your willingness to invent facts and conversations. It would be plainly a malicious act for you to lie about our conversation. I expect nothing but the worst from you, but you have been put on notice.
Mark O. Van Wagoner
From: Mark Van Wagoner "
To: "'barter@lesfrench.com'" "
Copies to: "Heidi A Nadel (E-mail)" ,",
"michael zwebner (E-mail)" "
Subject: FW: Defamation
Date sent: Thu, 24 Aug 2000 12:05:22 -0700
Mr. French,
I now understand that you apparently tape recorded the call. I did not do so because it would have been illegal for me to do so.
Mark O. Van Wagoner
From: "Mark O. Van Wagoner" "
To: "
Copies to: "michael zwebner" ,",
"Batten, Mark W." ,",
"Polk, Victor H., Jr." ,",
"Nadel, Heidi A." "
Subject: Your violent history
Date sent: Mon, 28 Aug 2000 12:22:44 -0600
Dear Mr. French,
I have read your false and self serving post on your own board. The level of your hypocrisy is staggering. How utterly fraudulent and cowardly for you to record our conversation. Now, for you to claim that you felt "threatened" is laughable to all who care to play the conversation. There is no threat in the conversation, only your shameless self promotion. Does Mr. Villasenor understand how you have used him to advance yourself?
On the other hand, you have a public history of violence that concerns everyone connected with this case. Anyone who would strike his son and his pregnant wife in such uncontrolled fury as to require them to seek the help of the police is a danger to anyone near him. The fact that you have behaved so deceptively with me greatly concerns me. In all my dealings with various forms of bad behavior from witnesses and lawyers, never has anyone stooped so low as to record a conversation, much less broadcast it as if it were a personal advertisement. How can you be the critic of anyone's behavior? Does the name Linda Tripp have any meaning to you?
On a par with that behavior is your plainly false public claim that you are ready and willing for the depositions when both you and your defacto client, Mr. Villasenor, have refused to produce a single document. Why don't you simply drive all of the documents to Ms. Tarbox this afternoon? We both know why.
Mark O. Van Wagoner
Offended by Van Wagoner¡¦s lack of moral character and professional ethics, I responded with the following email:
Sent: Tuesday, August 29, 2000 3:41 PM
Subject: Re: Your violent history
Dear Mr. Van Wagoner,
I am in receipt of your malicious and caustic email of August 28. Even though it seems we were able to engage in a "civil" telephone conversation on 8/22, I now see you have once again turned to your tactic of collateral personal attacks by directing false comments and false innuendo toward me. Your actions and your comments have betrayed the character your purport to be. Your personal conduct will only further complicate this case, and any chance of your client ever receiving a reasonable settlement offer from the defendants becomes nearly impossible.
As a "legal professional", you personally are responsible to exercise care and due diligence with the handling of "court documents". That is why common citizens, like myself, are discouraged from "practicing law" in the courthouse, remember?
I suggest that you counsel your client to remove the false, malicious, and defamatory statements he has made directed at me on the internet, and that both you and he apologize for your comments. Besides making a fool out of himself in front of the entire world, Mr. Zwebner has committed the textbook example of defamation and libel. From the comments you made on the phone and in your email, I can only conclude that you have some participation or liability in this smear campaign as well. You accuse me of "stooping low" and yet look at what your client has done, apparently with your full knowledge, aiding, and abetting.
And don't talk to me about "recording conversations". I seem to remember my personal correspondence to you showing up as exhibits in a recent motion before the Mass. court in which Mr. Zwebner's attorneys attempted to short-circuit my rights before the courts. MOTION DENIED!
Regarding my deposition, I have agreed to appear in California, but did not hear back from either you or Villasenor on this subject. As it stands, we are set for Boston on September 21. See you there!
Les French
Evidently, when I sent the above response to Van Wagoner, it was automatically ¡§replied¡¨ to everyone on Van Wagoner¡¦s original send list, including Zwebner. This is what Zwebner, the Chairman of Talk Visual Corporation, the Director of Sector Communications, the Public Relations agent for Entertainment Internet, sent back:
Send reply to: "Michael Zwebner" "
From: "Michael Zwebner" "
To: "
Copies to: "mark vanwagoner" "
Subject: Re: Your violent history
Date sent: Tue, 29 Aug 2000 15:54:06 -0400
Organization: TVCP
French
don't ever email me again, you piece of ####. I never want your ''aids'' infecting my computer.
go wack some other kid, or beat another pregnant mother.. or if you have spare time, go steal from a hotel and pass some more bum checks.....
the only one line of truth and sense you write is;
any chance of your client ever receiving a reasonable settlement offer from the defendants becomes nearly impossible.
at least you concede that you and your ''associates'' will lose, and will have to pay.
mz
From: "Michael Zwebner" "
To: "
Subject: Re: Your violent history
Date sent: Wed, 30 Aug 2000 19:34:07 -0400
FRENCH,
YOU LOW LIFE GOOD FOR NOTHING
I TOLD YOU NOT TO EMAIL ME.
DO AS I SAY.
AS FAR AS "Any statements you make can and will be used against you in a court of law! "
YOUR DAY IN COURT WILL SOON COME AROUND. THEN WE WILL PRESENT YOUR "STATEMENTS"
LETS SEE WHAT THE JUDGE AND JURY THINK ABOUT YOU.
NOW GET LOST AND GO BOTHER SOMEONE ELSE... JUST KEEP AWAY FROM CHILDREN AND PREGNANT MOTHERS.
MICHAEL
----- Original Message -----
From: Les French "
To: Michael Zwebner ; Michael Zwebner
"
Cc: mark vanwagoner ; Mary Tarbox "
Sent: Wednesday, August 30, 2000 4:00 PM
Subject: Re: Your violent history
> Dear Mr. Zwebner,
> I did not email you, nor do I care to. I was replying to a
> communication from your attorneys. Furthermore, your
> nonsensical and abusive language will only serve to betray your
> true nature before the public.
>
> I suggest you convey all future comments through your attorneys.
> Any statements you make can and will be used against you in a
> court of law!
>
> Les French
ragingbull.lycos.com |
