SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: frankw1900 who wrote (49280)10/4/2002 9:39:15 AM
From: Ilaine  Read Replies (2) of 281500
 
It went retrograde sometimes in the cold war

It went retrograde during the Cold War primarily because progressive forces almost inevitably allied themselves with Communists, or else were extirpated by Communists.

It's not like there were three choices - reactionary repression vs. progressive democracy vs. Communism. There were almost always only two - a repressive non-Communist government or a repressive Communist government.

Batista OR Castro.

Chiang OR Mao.

Somoza OR the Sandinistas.

The Communist Party line was that their bastards were better than our bastards, but history showed that to be vast, steaming piles of horse exhaust. Every place the Communists took over, and I mean EVERY place, they killed the progressives and those who wanted democracy, and instituted totalitarian autocracies.

But we still hear it today, on this thread, e.g., the argument that we were wrong to support the Afghani mujahideen because the Communists were better than the Taliban. Hey, guys, the Taliban wasn't one of the choices back then.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext