VALENCE TECHNOLOGY (VLNC) Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : VALENCE TECHNOLOGY (VLNC)

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Zeev Hed who wrote (25609)	10/5/2002 10:48:13 PM
From: MKT_entropy	Read Replies (1) of 27311

Zeev, you could as well send your very insightful physicist's comments to Prof. Chiang, I'm not kidding. However, the article in Nature Materials doesn't seem to indicate a substantial decrease in capacity, thus almost all lithium appears to be available for exchange. One thing I might have a problem with in your post is the statement that doping typically produces only a 2-3 orders of magnitude increase in conductivity--isn't it much more in typical semiconductors, such as silicon or germanium? Or are these SCs the exceptions? I left my Mermin at the office, so I won't argue... I guess we're following VLNC more of a habit than a real interest or belief in its prospects... Trading EK, HON or MRK is much more fun, isn't it? <VBG> Cheers, M_e

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next