SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Ask Michael Burke

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Joan Osland Graffius who wrote (97631)10/7/2002 9:18:58 AM
From: Knighty Tin  Read Replies (1) of 132070
 
Joan, A reverse split is usually considered a sign of pending bankruptcy, so cos. are loath to use it. Besides, having lots of mutual fund ownership has not helped them so far. It means that if these dopes can't own it due to price (and my own firm puts those silly limits on us, too. I need an act of Congress to buy anything under $5), once it starts to run, assuming it ever goes up again, the funds will pile on at the higher price.

In general, the funds with that restriction can hold the shares. They just can't buy new shares of a stock under a certain price.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext