Foreign Affairs Discussion Group Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Nadine Carroll who wrote (50099)	10/8/2002 4:06:09 AM
From: maceng2	Read Replies (1) of 281500

I do not consider this a reasonable method of categorization. What about the link that Cobalt gave? ict.org.il The total count figures agree, the classification is a little different. Does the Palestinian figure.. "People killed by actions of own side" = 217 Include the actual suicide bombers?? Anyway. I like to keep links from several sites to make sure the numbers tally approximately. The numbers of Palestinians being inadvertently killed is more then twice the rate then would be desirable for the peace process according to my theory. mba.vanderbilt.edu [It's a pity that the SI search feature only works on data from the last few weeks or so. I know we have links on advanced "tit for tat" theory on this thread. From my memory the best method of getting the desired aim is to actually punish less then the pain inflicted. The number of inadvertent Palestinian civilian deaths can be controlled by how much care and risk the Israeli troops use in punitive police actions] It's all gruesome stuff, measuring all this hacking of human flesh. The pain, deaths, and suffering. As yet I know of no other way in comprehending and dealing with the tragedy in the ME.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next