SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Ilaine who wrote (51108)10/11/2002 11:50:22 AM
From: JohnM  Read Replies (1) of 281500
 
It's always been that way, it always will be that way. Supreme courts interpret law de novo. That's what they are for.

CB,

Looks to me as if we'll just have to agree to disagree. I view the Gore-Bush stuff as embarrassing to the court, inherently political (not just political in the way the court is always just a bit), as contradicting their own past views (thus, enhancing the political character of the decision), and, finally, as having confessed to that by putting in that wonderful little aside that we should not take this all too seriously, after all it should not be treated as precedent.

You've clearly got a different view. There's a cliche in here somewhere about what it takes to make a conversation.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News