I did fully explain the issue... in excruciating detail to him... over MULTIPLE POSTS... over SEVERAL DAYS.
If you want to back-trace what must be 30 or 40 posts to him on this issue, over a week or so, feel free.
But you may find it far easier to just browse to the link he provided to support his RIDICULOUS CLAIM THAT BUSH WON A "POPULATION VOTE" VICTORY OVER GORE BY "16 MILLION VOTES"... and read all that's on the Web site.
You will - of course - note that there is NO SUCH THING AS A "POPULATION VOTE" (the site lists things like 'crime statistics' and the net area of various counties, as the support for this joke.)
Other posters here have pointed out to the hallucinating Tommie that this is a joke... put forward to needle other, equally spurious arguments advanced by various Democratic partisans... but he either falls to understand what a 'vote' is... or else he just likes lying to people and raising hell.
As far as him asking anything of me... it's a fairly lameoid trick of his: he refuses - over a week or more - to answer MY PRIOR QUESTION to explain how any of this 'crime statistics' stuffs amounts to 'votes', then siezes upon my concatanation of his two ridiculous claims that 1) Bush won a "population vote" by 16 million, and 2) the square area (amount of 'dirt') in a county, and the crime statistics there, amount somehow to legal 'votes'....... I concatanated these ridiculous and unsupported premises into an understandable (and, I think funnier) shorthand for Tommie's fraudulent claims: that he wants to give the vote to 'dirt clods'.
He understands this fully, and pulls an old trick of his by referring only to 'dirt clods'... while refusing to explain or justify his original psychotic claim of a "16 million vote margin for Bush"... based upon crime statistics and the area of counties, and other brick-a-brack not directly related to election voting.
As I've pointed out: ONLY VOTES THAT ARE ACTUALLY CAST ARE COUNTED IN DECIDING ELECTIONS... PEOPLE WHO STAY HOME AND DON'T VOTE ARE NOT COUNTED AS 'VOTES'.
I'm sure you, Zero, have no problem understanding the word 'vote'.
This idiotic claim of his is so ridiculous that I'm sure you also understand why he has refused to answer my very first question:
<Tommie, what is a 'vote'.>
If you need further explanation of the fraud and FUD he is attempting to spread... just browse to the Web site he linked, and read the joke yourself.
(I particularly liked the part about 'crime statistics'!)
(Try to find THAT in the Constitution!) |
