SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Stockman Scott's Political Debate Porch

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: surfbaron who wrote (8131)10/15/2002 12:23:22 PM
From: TigerPaw  Read Replies (2) of 89467
 
convinced Reagan was the big social spender

Reagan was a big spender. I never said he limited his spending to social programs. He spent more on everything, and it was his own proposals too, he wasn't dragged by Tip ONeil into that briar patch.

In fact, over the eight years of his presidency, Reagan asked Congress for $18.1 billion more in spending than was finally passed into law.
sccs.swarthmore.edu

There was one important part of Reagan's economic policy which was not as widely celebrated in public by the President and his economic advisors. The fall in tax revenue combined with massive defense outlays and spending cuts, which were totally insufficient to keep the budget in balance, created massive government deficits, the like of which our country had never seen in peacetime. Between 1980 and 1992, after 12 years of Reagan/Bush economic policy, the national debt nearly quadrupled to $3.5 trillion. Without the debt interest accumulated during the Reagan and Bush presidencies, the federal government would presently be running a surplus.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext