Foreign Affairs Discussion Group Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: JohnM who wrote (52352)	10/16/2002 10:31:41 AM
From: LindyBill	Read Replies (1) of 281500

It raises a host of very serious questions, Yes, it does. And it is being handled the right way, IMO. Now that I think about it, the Military was a lot more able to "Rain Dance" the Civilians under Clinton. They had a lot more freedom of action. Rumsfeld came in with prior experience and a lot of savvy, knowledgeable help. I was delighted to see that they are cutting back on the Raptor. I wish they would cancel it. Rumsfeld's problem with the Army is that "Armor" is running to show at the moment, and they are "Conventional Army" oriented. When Rumsfeld gets these guys out next year, he will be able to get changes through with a lot less opposition. It is too bad that we don't have a couple of "Rumsfeld" types to change over the FBI and the CIA.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next