Impeach George W. Bush Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Impeach George W. Bush

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: ManyMoose who wrote (15578)	10/17/2002 12:06:07 PM
From: bearshark	Read Replies (2) of 93284

You people are awfully quick to recommend infringing on the constitutionally protected rights of others. It's amazing how indignant you get when some whacko provokes unusual, albeit constitutional, measures. My note this morning was too brief. I do not understand the part of your note that I provide above. Perhaps the note of mine that you responded to was not clear. I have no problem with the federal government providing surveillance assistance to the states of Maryland and Virginia and the District of Columbia. I welcome it. However, the shootings around Washington D. C. are considered to be a local issue at this point. For that reason, I believe that the governors of the two states and the Mayor of the District should first specifically request the assistance. They might have done that. However, I did not see it. The articles I read said the federal government, represented by the FBI, asked the federal government, represented by the Department of Defense, for assistance. I do not believe that unilateral action by the federal government in a local issue is appropriate. If you prefer the federal government to dictate to the state of Alaska on local issues, then we are in disagreement.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next