SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Impeach George W. Bush

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: ManyMoose who wrote (15663)10/18/2002 4:15:04 AM
From: zonder  Read Replies (1) of 93284
 
Re: Why don't steel companies swing to the thin slab casting technology and tear down their old mills?

1) Because that would mean their complete annihilation. Seriously. It is a different system of production, with different raw materials and different systems. It would mean closing this company and starting another one as a green field project.

2) Thin slab casters need far less employees than the traditional integrated mills. Not only does the latter need to run its high furnaces 24 hours a day (shutting off is too costly) but it just has a far more complicated production process. So scrapping a traditional mill and building in its place a thin slab caster means firing thousands of employees. Have you been following FIAT people in Sicily, lately? Nobody will take that responsibility.

3) Integrated (old technology) steel mills have been built with enormous cost - even the newer ones, built in the past 10 years. If I recall correctly, investment cost was something along the lines of USD 2 mn for every million ton of capacity. Nobody will write off that kind of investment just to decrease costs.

So they turn to the state to increase subsidies and/or tariffs & quotas.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext