SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes : The Death of Silicon Investor
INSP 130.68-4.9%Dec 12 9:30 AM EST

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: mmmary who wrote (942)10/18/2002 5:45:54 PM
From: (Bob) Zumbrunnen  Read Replies (2) of 1003
 
Geez, here we go again. You might as well use a random word generator for your posts. They may contain more true statements that way.

Matt and Bob were in ihub when it was basically run by Goelo

False. Or do you assert that Goelo told me to suspend him? And to keep a tight leash on him on post deletions? You act like you're completely unaware of the situation when I first landed on that site.

Goelo called the shots on who stayed, who got booted, who could post.

False, false, and false.

Bob worked there in that situation.

That situation didn't exist, so I couldn't have been working there in that situation.

When Bob quit he told the world that Matt was a stock hypester

I most certainly did not. I left because of Mirarchi, not Matt.

I've never hyped a scam stock.

I agree. That's a true statement. Because you never speak positively about anything that I've seen, it's highly unlikely you've ever spoken positively about any stock, let alone a scam one. Well, let me qualify that. I've heard that you hyped a scam stock and that your relationship with the company turned sour, but I don't believe everything I hear. I read it from touts and I tend to dismiss anything a tout says, so the comment about you having hyped a scam stock is one I label "false until proven otherwise."

BTW, it's called "Critical Thinking". Look it up.

Allowing promoters to fleece investors on your site is a sin.

The existence of stock promoters is an unfortunate fact of life, both on messages boards and elsewhere. I don't hear you railing against the phone companies for all of the fleecing that was done via telephone.

The idea at the other site (and it was an ideal of SI's as well, which is why Raging Bull took off the way it did) was that though unscrupulous people are a fact of life, try not to make too fertile grounds for them.

As an aside, can you tell me why you think the devotees of the likes of RMIL, DGIV, and MTEI moved to Raging Bull? Hint: The same reason the other site's recent tout ("pumper clown", I believe is the correct terminology) is no longer posting on the other site.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext