SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: LindyBill who wrote (53374)10/20/2002 10:14:07 AM
From: JohnM  Read Replies (1) of 281500
 
John, none of know for sure just how close he is, but Saddam with Nukes is just an unacceptable solution in the ME and you know it. We have to get rid of him before that happens.

It's been apparent for some time that we just have to agree to disagree here on the following: (1) that not invading Iraq necessarily produces a Saddam led Iraq down the road with nukes with some sort of blackmail like control over ME oil resources--it's imaginable, definitely, but also not a foregone conclusion; (2) that invading Iraq produces a better ME than not doing so: and (3) that invading Iraq should be our top priority in the ME, let alone in our foreign policy.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News