SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Gold/Mining/Energy : Nuvo Research Inc

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Montana Wildhack who wrote (11218)10/20/2002 2:12:20 PM
From: Montana Wildhack  Read Replies (1) of 14101
 
Oops. That's the ladies room.

After writing the most massive post ever, I've decided
not to post it (to the relief of some).

I see it as a waste right now.

So I will keep this short. Despite the current conditions
I am the most optimistic at this time in comparison to
any previous date. For 3-4 years I gambled that Rebecca
(or anyone) could see the Pennsaid NDA through which was
a large risk.

I have not forgotten that all hinges on FDA approval or
that it would be ideal to have JNJ selling it.

Secondly, I will post the market size and finally I will
post a grid of Earnings Per Share so that people asking
themselves how to view the upcoming OXO shares will have
my input.

Market for NSAID's in the US:

Year 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006

Size % 8,000,000,000 9,200,000,000 10,580,000,000 12,167,000,000 13,992,050,000

0.03 240,000,000 276,000,000 317,400,000 365,010,000 419,761,500
0.04 320,000,000 368,000,000 423,200,000 486,680,000 559,682,000
0.05 400,000,000 460,000,000 529,000,000 608,350,000 699,602,500
0.07 560,000,000 644,000,000 740,600,000 851,690,000 979,443,500

The 2002 and 03 columns aren't relevant since maturity will not be achieved. These are not lofty goals for a branding
expert advertising into the market most driven by
advertising with a product that while different has some
key features.

Finally, based on the 4% line with the left number being
the shares outstanding in millions here are the effects
on EPS over the same years as above

EPS 50 1.43 1.65 1.89 2.18 2.50
55 1.30 1.50 1.72 1.98 2.28
60 1.19 1.37 1.58 1.81 2.09
65 1.10 1.27 1.46 1.68 1.93
70 1.02 1.18 1.35 1.56 1.79

Using the 2004 line with the actual values being irrelevant
the difference between having 50 and 60 million shares
outstanding would be the difference between having $1.58
and $1.89. Material but not a decision maker. Use your
own values and the materiality doesn't change. Use an
example showing borderline earnings and its still irrelevant
since either situation is equally poor.

With cash, they've never had any. And they've never had
a better story to tell to go get some.

Good luck.

Wolf
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext