Foreign Affairs Discussion Group Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Hawkmoon who wrote (53564)	10/21/2002 8:45:36 AM
From: JohnM	Read Replies (1) of 281500

John... Personally, I would feel that posting Ann Coulter and her banter on this thread is about a inappropriate as posting Dowd... Both are famous for giving off more heat than light. As I recall, Dowd won a Pulitzer for commentary. But the last two or three columns of hers were comparable to Coulter. Given the stuff that gets posted to this thread, this most recent column of Dowd's certainly doesn't mark a bottom. Just in case you are interested (never can really tell), I didn't post the Dowd piece. But I thought it funny and said so. Btw, thanks for removing that thinly veiled bias we all knew lurked behind your "I need to be convinced" semantics... That may be the way you do this. I don't. I'm hear to read and learn. And have done a ton of both over the past many months. Pollack taught me a great deal. The Simon and Benjamin book is teaching me a great deal. Kepel ditto. Miller ditto. I gather that you consider the purpose of reading is to confirm already held positions.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next