SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Amazon.com, Inc. (AMZN)
AMZN 232.08-0.2%3:59 PM EST

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Oeconomicus who wrote (149040)10/21/2002 7:39:47 PM
From: hueyone  Read Replies (2) of 164684
 
Although there were numerous reasons why the U.S. did not march to Baghdad and topple Saddam during the Gulf War, certainly the position of the U.N was a very prominent reason.

Although I cannot find my copy of Shwarzkopf's book "It Doesn't Take a Hero", I do have my copy of Colin Powell's 1996 autobiography titled "My American Journey" in front of me now on my desk. There is an entire chapter devoted to the Gulf War titled "Every War Must End". In this chapter, Powell refers to the internaional coalition and U.N. position time and time again.

I quote from General Powell's 1996 autobiography: "But why didn't we push on to Baghdad once we had Saddam on the run? Why didn't we finish him off? Or, to put it another way, why didn't we move the goalposts? What tends to be forgotten is that while the United States led the way, we were heading an international coalition carrying out a clearly defined UN mission. That mission was accomplished."

Best regards, Huey
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext