Does it seem to reflect what Jerry said now?
ref(fml("DNS"),-8)=8 and
fml("DNS")>=5 and
ref(fml("DNS"),-1)>=5 and
ref(fml("DNS"),-2)>=5 and
ref(fml("DNS"),-3)>=5 and
ref(fml("DNS"),-4)>=5 and
ref(fml("DNS"),-5)>=5 and
ref(fml("DNS"),-6)>=5 and
ref(fml("DNS"),-7)>=5
I'm sorry I haven't given your chart a close look yet. I've been obsessed with reviewing some of the systems presented at TAINJ, and fidding with them in WOW.
Your ideas in the chart are an intriguing addition to the BNS project, and I think Bill Sandusky and Paul Beattie will be interested in them. I'm taking the liberty of posting what you said about the chart:
"In the attachment's second pane, there is a red binary type indicator. This
is the Stochastics indicator you just posted on SI. Also in that pane is a
white binary type indicator. This indicator ( when it starts to rise)
states that CCI (WoW's CCI) has dipped below -150, then counts 10 days, and
drops back to zero. The third indicator in that pane is a MACD 5, 35, 4.
"The Idea before I saw your stochastic post is that the MACD must cross
inside the white box. This states that CCI has crossed below - 150 and that
MACD has ten days after to cross, or forget the trade.
"The same MACD crossing scenario seems to work well inside your stochastics
indicator. I'm now looking to see if there are points where the red box,
white box, and the MACD crossing all occur at the same time." |
