Amazon.com, Inc. (AMZN) Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Amazon.com, Inc. (AMZN)

AMZN 232.50

+0.1%

Dec 26 3:59 PM EST

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: GST who wrote (149131)	10/23/2002 12:38:42 PM
From: Oeconomicus	Read Replies (1) of 164684

You call those facts? Not a fact in the bunch - only your opinions. If we go to war, it will either happen WITH UN backing or AFTER the UN proves itself incapable of doing anything but vacillate. If we do not go to war, it will be because Saddam has been, or is being, rendered harmless, which was the objective all along. Precisely what position could have been "used to [successfully] rally a coalition?" BTW, "It could've been handled better" is not a fact except to the extent that there's room for improvement in nearly everything. Regime change has never been the objective, but only a possibly or maybe even necessary means to achieve the objective, which, again, is to render Saddam harmless. Bush and Cheney did not invent the idea of regime change and they were not the first to conclude that regime change was likely the only way to disarm Iraq. Congress concluded the same thing four years ago. And that IS a fact.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next