Foreign Affairs Discussion Group Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: tekboy who wrote (54183)	10/23/2002 12:39:48 PM
From: carranza2	Read Replies (1) of 281500

Pollack's lapel-tugging of his CIA bosses about his correct view that Saddam was about to invade Kuwait in '90 stands in stark contrast to what we see now. The present bosses seem to want the intelligence slanted to fit the view that invasion is warranted. I simply don't understand why they wish to run the risk of having their machinations exposed, thereby hurting their cause--a proper one, in my view. Why must the CIA be politicized more than it already is? The apparent CIA conclusion that there are negligible links between Saddam and AQ in no way changes my opinion that Saddam has to go and pronto.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next