SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Sharks in the Septic Tank

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: epicure who wrote (63520)10/23/2002 10:59:27 PM
From: E  Read Replies (1) of 82486
 
Don't you recall that we've already established certain things?

Such as that the "more than once, more than twice" was...

guess how many?

And that yes, I felt defiant after your first threat to sue me in 3D for a completely cyber exchange. (Oh yes, you were only pretending to threaten to sue me, when secretly you making a different 3D threat! But how was I to know! How, how, how? I wasn't. Any more than N was. We both took it exactly as you intended it to be taken! (Even though you were faking. You now say. For some reason.)

You sure did get rattled over couple of PMs in which you and a former friend were having an emotional exchange, and then three emails!

The first email I sent to you was this, with a pasted PM I can't include, of course:

There is a problem with in essence calling someone a liar and then saying you won't read their reply. I don't know if "won't read" means you don't see my PM or not, but in case, here the the answer to your inaccurate characterizations of me, though since you weren't specific about the "contradictions," I can't address the issue fully.

After getting that email, you threatened to sue me, having gotten really really upset in 3D over a mere UNREAL exchange.

I was naughty and defiant (and appalled and indignant at how you had treated, and the ugly things you had said about, a former mutual friend who was in trouble) and sent two more emails -- and I have apologized a number of times for this.

Is it possible that you think the PM's that so upset you that you forbade me to talk to you in PM is unreal and is in zero dimensions but that emails are real and are in 3D? What about emailed threats worded so as to make the recipients think you are threatening to sue them? Are they real?

The woman who was going to be sued by the person you proposed to represent (or pretended to, the way you pretended, if you are to be believed, that you were going to represent yourself in suing me), thought the 3D was real enough that she retained a lawyer of her own, btw.

So you can drop your 3D hypocrisy. It's insane of you anyway. Why you brought it up again beats me. How many apologies for something Unreal do you want? Wasn't it enough that you threatened me in 3D for it?

You weren't nice. You deserved the terrible, scary experience of receiving three emails from me one of which was a pasted PM in which I defended a third party whom you kicked when he or she was very far down.

You sure scare easily. Thank God nobody stalked and sexually harassed and threatened and lied about a fictional sexual relationship, for weeks and weeks, even after cosmic asked him to stop, and also accused you of disrespecting our boys in uniform or, even, accused you of being into viewing sadistic porn on the internet (making that accusation as a "word game.")

You sure decide who's worthy of your support and friendship according to very odd criteria.

Yuck.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext