SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes : Clown-Free Zone... sorry, no clowns allowed

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Lucretius who started this subject10/24/2002 7:38:31 AM
From: Box-By-The-Riviera™  Read Replies (1) of 436258
 
Today's Heard on the Street:

"If 2002 was the year of options, the year 2003 will be that of pension-fund accounting," says Kenneth Shea, head of global equity research at S&P, a unit of McGraw-Hill Cos.

On a net-income basis, the big-company S&P 500-stock index earned $26.74 a share for the 12 months ended June 30. But, after adjusting to account for items including both the actual rate of return on pension funds as well as the expensing of stock options, the figure drops to $18.48 a share, which S&P calls "core earnings." Of the difference, pension-fund costs outpace stock-option costs, $6.54 versus $5.21, while some positive items kick in to offset some of the collective bad news.

Using the core earnings method, Anheuser-Busch, for example, would have reported $1.84 a share for the 12 months ending June 30. However, on a net-income basis, Anheuser-Busch reported $2.05 per share. Of the difference 8 cents comes from the expensing of stock options, while 14 cents is attributable to pension-fund costs, nearly double the cost of stock options.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext