You just jump from accusation and evasion to accusation and evasion. You never respond to points. I suppose if you did you'd have to adjust your sacred opinion. It is not a discussion if one party feels no obligation to be responsive. It's a boring and stupid way to argue.
Now I'm supposed to substantiate what everyone on the thread except fragile you, who freak out at three emails and think somebody's whispering in your mail slot, saw, over weeks and weeks of CH's vile harassment of Poet?
You want repostings of CH's vileness? Are you serious?
If you thought it wasn't harassment, threatening, slanderous, improper, abusive of Poet's privacy then, just stay with your opinion. You make yourself into a sideshow.
You know perfectly well that CH threatened over and over to post personal, by implication intimate, information about Poet. You know he said he had it but wasn't posting it only because he needed her permission. When she gave him permission he had to back down, and he was exposed not only as a threatener but as a liar.
BTW: I did the same thing? I threatened someone that I was going to expose "private information" about them? What are you talking about? Go down that "alley," please. Post my threat. Let's see if that's as true as your recent unpretty twisting of a single confidential phonecall I had to your purposes. |
